Thanks for visiting :) You can find books in similar genres/with similar star ratings/by the same author by clicking on tags at the end of the reviews. These are my own reading choices only; I do not accept submissions, or do 'review swaps'. If you would like to follow me on Twitter, I'm @TerryTyler4. Comments welcome; your email will not be kept for mailing lists or any other use, and nor will it appear on the comment.
was looking forward to this book, as it deals with the subjects of
reincarnation and time slips between the 19th century and the
It’s a very good story idea, it’s well thought out,
feasible, and there are no plot holes or errors of continuity. The (American) English is perfect, and the
proofreading was virtually faultless, which is always a big plus. The subject matter of diving for historical
artefacts is extremely well researched; I read in the back of the book about
how much work the author had done on this and was impressed; it will probably
appeal to anyone who is interested in this subject.
So why only three stars?
I found the narrative rather old fashioned. The romantic side of it is a bit Mills and
Boon, with the occasional throwing in of something more ‘earthy’ that seemed a
little incongruous. It was predictable - as soon as handsome Daniel Costello was introduced I guessed the outcome. I found the
delivery and dialogue a tad wooden throughout; aside from Hennessey, the
brutish head of the diving team, one character’s dialogue was indistinguishable
from another’s, with a relaying of information as opposed to painting a
portrait of the person. Ms Stevan has
used regional dialect accurately, but I never had the feeling of
different ‘voices’, and could not see any of the people in my mind’s eye.
The point of view changed from Catherine to Daniel on a
few occasions, and this new outlook made the story perk up. My attention was also renewed when Catherine
began to unravel the mystery, in Ireland; I thought the Irish section was the
best, and I imagine well researched too (I’ve never been to Ireland, so can’t
say). However, I felt this could have been
done in a much more intriguing way, perhaps with alternating between past and
present so that we knew more about Margaret and James; the piece set in the 19th
century is so brief that I had all but forgotten about it by about a third of
the way through. The mystery would have been far more compelling if it had been
unleashed gradually, rather than the reader being told more or less everything
at the very beginning. Throughout the
book there was too much exposition (dialogue used to give necessary background
information, executed in an contrived manner) and ‘telling, not showing’ (delivering
statements to tell the reader what a character is like, rather than allowing a
picture to build up via his/her speech and behaviour, and others’ reactions to
sum up – it’s a fairly competent debut novel, but for me it fell flat. However, a review can only ever be one
person’s opinion, and readers who like a more conservative approach to dialogue
and predictable romantic developments might well enjoy it very much; I see that it has
other, more postive reviews and I imagine the author’s style will develop. I’d like to thank Ms Stevan for supplying a
review copy of this book, and wish her luck in her writing career.